When running for lieutenant governor on the Republican ticket with Tom Foley in 2014, Heather Somers privately urged the Foley campaign to aggressively exploit a vulnerability of the Democratic incumbent, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. Somers wanted to loudly call out the Malloy administration’s policies that allowed inmates more opportunities to earn early release, an approach that did not go well in a few cases when some ex-cons committed serious crimes.

Foley, however, was playing things safe, convinced that if he avoided controversies he would be the new governor because Malloy could not overcome his poor approval ratings. Foley’s campaign did not make the law-and-order play that Somers was sure could have picked up some votes for the Republican ticket in high-crime urban areas.

Foley’s cautious strategy failed and Malloy narrowly won re-election.

It is not without some irony, then, that Senator Somers — elected in the 18th District in 2016 — found herself at a press conference Wednesday criticizing the Malloy administration for failing to adequately protect the health of prisoners and for a lack of transparency on the issue.

“The legislature is now obligated to step in and speak up for those who have suffered from these inhumane conditions. We need to know the full story so we can determine the best course to prevent this tortuous neglect,” said Somers at the Republican-only event.

There is a difference, certainly, between the policies that dictate when a prisoner is released and how they are treated while incarcerated. And Somers, as co-chair of the Public Health Committee, is in the right position to push for answers.

Still, it’s an interesting role reversal. Malloy, who has pushed prison reform and more “second chances” for ex-cons is under attack from a Republican law-and-order candidate concerned about the treatment of prisoners.

Somers, joined at the press conference by Republican Senate leader Len Fasano of North Haven, has a good case.

In a recent special report, The Connecticut Mirror noted that the Office of the Attorney General has, in the past decade, logged more than 1,000 complaints and lawsuits from inmates about the health care they did or didn’t receive. There are numerous pending lawsuits.

A report done for the Department of Correction reviewed 25 cases related to health care problems, including eight prisoner deaths.

After a Feb. 13 incident, in which a female inmate gave birth inside a York Correctional Institution prison cell in Niantic, the department placed two nurses on leave.

Unlike 35 other states, Connecticut has no quality monitoring system to assess the adequacy of prison health care.

The Hartford press conference featured the family of inmate Wayne World, serving time for manslaughter. World raised concerns in 2012 about a rash. Doctors never properly diagnosed or treated it. World recently learned he has advanced stage, life-threatening skin cancer.

In response to the problems, DOC last month ended its long-time relationship with UConn Health to provide care and moved services in-house.

Somers and Fasano complain the legislature remains uninformed about the details and root causes of the problem and have demanded a public hearing on the prison medical care system.

And they want to see the $63,000 consultant study that examined the 25 cases and eight deaths. The Malloy administration has refused to provide access, citing attorney-client privilege and contending its release would undermine the DOC’s legal strategy. The Freedom of Information Commission backed the DOC’s refusal to release it.

The department has also held up the release of a second consultant study that cost $600,000.

While this is not your typical Republican issue, Somers needs to keep pushing. The legislature should perform its oversight duty. The Democrats don’t appear eager to do so.

Paul Choiniere is the editorial page editor.

The state health department would take over inspections, an outside panel would monitor conditions, and workers would be legally required to report mistreatment in a bill born of the patient-abuse scandal at the maximum-security Whiting forensic facility.

The measures would be a first step in changing a culture behind Whiting’s walls — a climate that tolerated what amounted to the torture of patient William Shehadi, the patient’s brother, Albert Shehadi, said in remarks prepared for the legislature’s public health committee at a hearing Friday.

Federal and state lawsuits filed by Albert Shehadi allege a pattern of physical abuse, all caught on video and perpetrated under the noses of management. Ten Whiting employees have been arrested on felony cruelty charges, and a total of more than 30 workers have been fired.

Most of the patients at Whiting are either being evaluated to see if they can stand trial or have been acquitted of criminal charges by reason of insanity.

Mental Health Commissioner Miriam Delphin-Rittmon testified Friday that she is trying “to change the environment” at the psychiatric hospital in Middletown by adding managers, opening new lines of communication for staff members and increasing training. But many legislators and advocates were stunned and enraged that unprovoked abuse of a patient could go on for weeks, and play out on video monitors at the nurse’s station and other locations, and go undetected until a whistleblower came forward.

Whiting is hampered by a “one-size-fits-all treatment” regimen, has a staff that is “inadequately trained” and management “that is largely absent outside of daytime shifts,” Albert Shehadi said.

“There are no internal controls,” said Shehadi, who lives in Greenwich and is the chief lending officer at a health care capital firm in New York City.

The outside panel or task force contemplated in the bill should have subpoena power so it can go after internal records and compel testimony, said one of the bill’s architects, Sen. Heather Somers, a Republican of Groton, and co-chairwoman of the public health committee.

She said that while the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services requires patient-care workers to report abuse, they are not included in the group of professionals — teachers, police officers, doctors, nurses, social workers — that could face criminal prosecution if they fail to report suspected abuse or neglect. The bill would put forensic-treatment workers and some other Whiting employees into that category, Somers said.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy earlier this year signed an executive order separating Whiting from the rest of the campus at Connecticut Valley Hospital. Under the bill discussed Friday, Whiting would officially become a hospital, and it would be licensed and inspected by the state Department of Public Health.

The agency would conduct unannounced visits whenever a complaint was received, Health Commissioner Raul Pino told the legislative committee.

When legislators noted that problems can occur on all shifts, Pino said his inspectors would come at odd hours, including weekends and late at night, and not confine themselves to the day shift when most of the Whiting bosses are around.

Mystic — A panel of Stonington fishermen and fishing industry lobbyists repeated their perennial cries against the federal government’s fishing quotas at an event hosted by state Sen. Heather Somers on Wednesday night, telling an audience at the Mystic Luxury Theatre that the regulations could cause the demise of their industry.

Somers invited Stonington and Rhode Island fishing veterans to speak about the effects of a regulatory system used by the National Marine Fisheries Service that is meant to prevent overfishing but that they say is strangling their industry. She also arranged for the screening of a commercial fishing-themed episode of a show produced by the conservative digital website CRTV at the theater.

“We people up here in Connecticut got the dirty end of the stick,” said Joe Rendeiro, a retired full-time commercial fisherman. “We’re just a bunch of people trying to make a living.”

Stonington fishermen like Rendeiro have long bemoaned the government’s attempts to regulate fishing by instituting quotas for species like fluke — also called summer flounder — in regions along the East Coast from the mid-Atlantic to New England.

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, on which Connecticut has no representation, regulates fluke and other species for the East Coast, along with a larger body, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. Fishing industry advocates say the quota system allows Connecticut fishermen to land far less fish than other states such as North Carolina, even though most of the fish are caught in federal and not state waters.

The two groups adjusted their limits this year to allow Connecticut fishermen to catch more summer flounder and not as much sea bass in 2018, but Stonington fishermen say the effects of the changing quotas would be nominal given an unfair system.

The quotas and the monitors employed to enforce them, cheap imported fish, the development of wind farms on the Atlantic coast and the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act were all the target of criticism from the speakers at Wednesday’s event.

The panel also included Mike Gambardella, who runs his family’s fish wholesale business at the Town Dock and who has led an effort to print and sell bumper stickers with a message for President Donald Trump urging him to “Make Commercial Fishing Great Again.”

Atlantic fishermen say the quotas that govern the amount of fish they’re allowed to bring in are based on inaccurate measurements of fish populations, and have long claimed that they see higher numbers of various species on their daily trips than the NOAA scientists count on their periodic trips to assess the populations on which they base their quotas.

“The stock assessments are wrong,” said Tom Williams, a Stonington fisherman who spoke Wednesday and was featured in the CRTV piece hosted by conservative blogger Michelle Malkin.

Somers invited Meghan Lapp, a fishing industry advocate and a representative for North Kingstown, R.I.-based fishing company Seafreeze to speak at Wednesday’s event.

“Fishermen are the farmers of the sea,” she said. “They … provide a clean, healthy sustainable source of protein.”

[email protected]

Citing a crisis in medical care behind prison walls, legislative leaders on Wednesday called for an inquiry, and renewed a request for a report on 25 botched medical cases, including eight inmate deaths, that the Department of Correction has refused to release.

State Sen. Len Fasano of North Haven, the Republican president pro tem, said at a news briefing that someone at the DOC “needs to have the guts to look us in the eye” and say whether “that report will ever see the light of day.”

He stepped aside and allowed Carrie World, the mother of a state inmate whose lymphoma went undiagnosed for three years despite bloody rashes covering his body, to describe the “20 times” she demanded information about her son’s lack of medical care. The family is now pressing a medical-malfeasance lawsuit, one of a growing number of cases alleging substandard care.

The widow of a former longtime state employee, World said her son, Wayne World, was brought up to face the consequences of his actions.

He’s been in prison since 2006 on a manslaughter conviction, “but he has been given a second sentence that could cost him his life.”

The Courant reported in June that the prison agency, citing attorney-client privilege, had refused the newspaper’s request for the publicly funded report, completed by a consultant who is a doctor and a lawyer. The agency also declined a request for the report by the state’s auditors, who had criticized the relationship between UConn Heath, which provided the medical care, and the DOC, which paid the bill of more than $100 million a year for the no-bid contract. The auditors said the arrangement lacked quality controls and oversight.

Last month, the state ended its agreement with UConn Health and moved the administration of medical care inside the DOC — but Fasano, who was also denied the consultant’s report, said questions are beginning to multiply about apparent lapses in care.

Fasano, Sen. Heather Somers, a Republican of Groton, and Sen. George Logan, a Republican of Ansonia, called for a public hearing during this shortened legislative session on the operation of medical care inside prisons and an explanation of why it is going wrong.

Fasano said the attorney-client protection is a sound legal principle, but that it was possible it should be waived in this case. Attorney General George Jepsen’s office has said it commissioned the consultant’s report to help the Department of Correction defend against lawsuits in some or all of the 25 medical cases.

Somers, who with Logan is a co-chair of the public health committee, likened what she said she is learning about “systemic failures” in prison health care to the patient abuse scandal at the Whiting Forensic Division. Ten workers were charged with cruelty and the state is facing federal and state lawsuits.

Somers said the prison care contract had been “blindly awarded” to UConn Heath year after year, essentially as a subsidy, and that certain situations, such as an inmate going without medication for five months, were intolerable.

She said in some instances, “this would be considered torturous neglect.”

And Logan, noting the auditors’ findings about a lack of quality control said, “As a result, taxpayers are subsidizing UConn, which has failed to provide an acceptable standard of care.”

The lawmakers said a date has not been set for the public hearing.

“These inmates have no choice” but to rely on prison medical care, Fasano said, “and that heightens the state’s responsibility. How can the legislature fix the problem if it doesn’t know what it is? That’s our responsibility and we can’t delegate it to anyone else.”